首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Epson scanner quality for radiochromic film evaluation
【2h】

Comparison of Epson scanner quality for radiochromic film evaluation

机译:爱普生扫描仪质量对比,用于放射性变色胶片评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Epson Desktop scanners have been quoted as devices which match the characteristics required for the evaluation of radiation dose exposure by radiochromic films. Specifically, models such as the 10000XL have been used successfully for image analysis and are recommended by ISP for dosimetry purposes. This note investigates and compares the scanner characteristics of three Epson desktop scanner models including the Epson 10000XL, V700, and V330. Both of the latter are substantially cheaper models capable of A4 scanning. As the price variation between the V330 and the 10000XL is 20-fold (based on Australian recommended retail price), cost savings by using the cheaper scanners may be warranted based on results. By a direct comparison of scanner uniformity and reproducibility we can evaluate the accuracy of these scanners for radiochromic film dosimetry. Results have shown that all three scanners can produce adequate scanner uniformity and reproducibility, with the inexpensive V330 producing a standard deviation variation across its landscape direction of 0.7% and 1.2% in the portrait direction (reflection mode). This is compared to the V700 in reflection mode of 0.25% and 0.5% for landscape and portrait directions, respectively, and 0.5% and 0.8% for the 10000XL. In transmission mode, the V700 is comparable in reproducibility to the 10000XL for portrait and landscape mode, whilst the V330 is only capable of scanning in the landscape direction and produces a standard deviation in this direction of 1.0% compared to 0.6% (V700) and 0.25% (10000XL). Results have shown that the V700 and 10000XL are comparable scanners in quality and accuracy with the 10000XL obviously capable of imaging over an A3 area as opposed to an A4 area for the V700. The V330 scanner produced slightly lower accuracy and quality with uncertainties approximately twice as much as the other scanners. However, the results show that the V330 is still an adequate scanner and could be used for radiation dosimetry purposes. As such, if budgetary requirements are limited, the V700 scanner would be the recommended option at a price eight times cheaper than the 10000XL; however, the V330 produces adequate results at a price which is 2.5 times cheaper again. This may be a consideration for smaller institutions or individuals working with radiochromic film dosimetry.
机译:Epson Desktop扫描仪已被引用为与评估放射性变色胶片辐射剂量暴露所需的特性相匹配的设备。具体而言,诸如10000XL之类的模型已成功用于图像分析,并被ISP推荐用于剂量测定。本说明调查并比较了三种Epson台式扫描仪型号(包括Epson 10000XL,V700和V330)的扫描仪特性。后者都是能够进行A4扫描的便宜得多的机型。由于V330和10000XL之间的价格差异是20倍(基于澳大利亚的建议零售价),因此根据结果,可以保证使用更便宜的扫描仪来节省成本。通过直接比较扫描仪的均匀性和可重复性,我们可以评估这些扫描仪对放射致变色胶片剂量的准确性。结果表明,所有三台扫描仪均可产生足够的扫描仪均匀性和可重复性,而便宜的V330在其横向(纵向)(反射模式)上的标准偏差为0.7%和1.2%。相比之下,V700在反射模式下横向和纵向的反射模式分别为0.25%和0.5%,而10000XL的反射模式为0.5%和0.8%。在传输模式下,V700在纵向和横向模式下的可复制性可与10000XL媲美,而V330仅能够在横向方向上进行扫描,并且在该方向上产生的标准偏差为1.0%,而标准偏差为0.6%(V700)和0.25%(10000XL)。结果表明,V700和10000XL在质量和准确性上可与之媲美,而10000XL显然能够在V3的A3区域而不是A4区域成像。 V330扫描仪产生的精度和质量略低,不确定性大约是其他扫描仪的两倍。但是,结果表明V330仍然是一台足够的扫描仪,可用于辐射剂量测定。因此,如果预算需求有限,则推荐使用V700扫描仪,其价格比10000XL便宜八倍;但是,V330的价格却便宜了2.5倍,因此可以产生足够的效果。对于从事放射致变色膜剂量测定的较小机构或个人,这可能是一个考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号